Once the government takes active roles in, say, people's health--they are then obliged to dictate what will and will not be deemed healthy. Coercion from above.
The idea is to discourage consumption of high-caloric beverages — health officials estimate a 5 percent drop — and to raise $404 million in fiscal year 2009-2010 toward the state's multibillion dollar budget gap. Paterson said the proposal would raise $539 million in 2010-2011.Where do I opt out? (Colorado, I hope.)
2 comments:
Mr. Mowry - I believe you are correct. Even by gov't standards a calorie tax is quite a forward thinking development. I believe next should be a lint tax so college students do not have the resources to rescue security deposits...
PS - all's very well with the wookie and love the pics of your place!
Hey, what wookiee's found me here? Where could he be?
I've been pondering the saying, "If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything". Hence, nearly three months go by without me posting (or checking in) here.
Contact me sometime. I'd love to catch up with things. Contact info at industrialdesignhaus.com if nowhere else.
Post a Comment